01Learn more →
MSME Delayed Payment Recovery
MSMED Act claims with interest up to 3× RBI Bank Rate. Fast-track through the Facilitation Council.
Recover Your Outstanding Invoices
NexEra Legal is a boutique commercial litigation & recovery firm for businesses tired of chasing unpaid invoices, broken contracts and silent debtors. We turn receivables into recoveries — through MSMED claims, Summary Suits, NCLT pressure and on-the-ground execution.
Each matter starts with a strategy memo: which remedy applies, what pressure it creates and how fast money can move.
MSMED Act claims with interest up to 3× RBI Bank Rate. Fast-track through the Facilitation Council.
Corporate and commercial debt recovery, vendor disputes and contractual payment defaults.
Order XXXVII CPC for invoices, purchase orders, written contracts and acknowledged debts.
§8 Demand Notice and §9 NCLT Petition — India's highest-pressure corporate recovery remedy.
Order 21 CPC — bank attachment, garnishee, property attachment, receiver, auction and sale.
Mis-sold insurance, mis-sold finance, unfair lending, hidden commissions and misrepresentation.
Under §16 of the MSMED Act, buyers owe compound interest at three times the RBI bank rate, compounded monthly, from the appointed day. Most businesses leave this on the table.
Illustrative. Actual interest depends on the prevailing RBI bank rate and appointed day.
Answer below to see which remedy fits your matter. No data is stored unless you book an assessment.
Business-first legal strategy. We speak P&L, not just procedure.
Modern case systems, automation and analytics across every matter.
Measured by money in your account, not judgments on paper.
Pressure points identified early. Parallel tracks where it counts.
These are real matters handled by NexEra lawyers. Names, locations and specific identifiers have been altered or withheld to comply with BCI rules on client confidentiality and advertising.
A precision-tool MSME supplier was sitting on ₹2.34 Cr of unpaid invoices from a large listed FMCG buyer. Invoices were 14 months overdue; the buyer had stopped acknowledging email reminders entirely.
MSEFC reference (Punjab) filed within 48 hours. Simultaneous §8 IBC demand notice served to create dual-track pressure. Filed an affidavit of urgency citing the buyer's recent divestment news.
Buyer settled at 100% principal plus ₹47.6 L in MSMED compound interest within 41 days. No admission, no trial.
A fleet operator was owed ₹68 L across 90+ freight invoices by an e-commerce aggregator. The aggregator had moved to a 'self-billing' model and was denying liability on historical ledgers.
Consolidated all PODs, e-way records and acknowledged ledger entries into a single Order XXXVII Summary Suit in the Delhi High Court. Sought leave to defend to be set aside as sham.
Settlement at 92% of the claim — including full principal and 60% of interest — before the written statement was even filed. Matter resolved in 73 days.
A garment exporter was owed USD 410,000 (₹3.42 Cr then) by a domestic textile group. The debtor denied the debt, claimed quality defects, and had started CIRP proceedings against a subsidiary to cloud the picture.
Forensic notice under §8 IBC with a detailed debt matrix. Filed §9 NCLT petition with the Mumbai Bench. Demonstrated that the 'quality' claim was a post-hoc invention with no contemporaneous documentation.
Debtor settled at 100% of principal + 18% interest + legal costs 11 days before the NCLT admission hearing. The NCLT petition was withdrawn with costs.
A civil contractor had a decree for ₹1.15 Cr from a real-estate developer. The decree was 3 years old; the developer had dissolved its Punjab entity and transferred assets to a new SPV.
Order 21 execution — application for attachment before judgment, garnishee on the SPV's bank account, and a prayer for receiver appointment on an unsold commercial parcel.
Bank attachment released ₹81 L within 22 days. Receiver appointed on the commercial parcel; auction proceedings initiated. Total recovery expected at 108% of decree value including costs and interest.
A boutique IT consulting firm was owed ₹34 L for delivered SOW milestones by a Series-B SaaS company. The SaaS company had changed leadership and was refusing to honour contracts signed by the outgoing CEO.
Order XXXVII Summary Suit in the Bengaluru City Civil Court. Annexed email acknowledgements, signed SOW, and milestone acceptance emails. Sought summary judgment under O.37 R.2(3).
Summary judgment granted in 6 months. The defendant's leave to defend was rejected as 'no triable issue' under the Karnataka High Court's O.37 guidelines. Execution initiated immediately.
A medical-device MSME distributor was owed ₹1.89 Cr by a hospital chain for ventilator supplies during COVID-19. The hospital chain was under moratorium from a separate lender's CIRP.
MSEFC reference for the undisputed principal. Simultaneously, filed an application before the NCLT to lift the moratorium under §14(2)(c) IBC for operational creditors with essential supplies.
MSEFC awarded full principal + ₹28 L interest. The NCLT allowed partial lifting of moratorium for COVID-era essential creditors. Hospital settled both claims within 58 days to avoid adverse NCLT orders.
Any entity holding a Udyam Registration on the date of supply qualifies. The buyer's size or registration is irrelevant for the claim.
Share a few details. A NexEra lawyer responds within one business day with a written strategy memo — no obligation.